![]() It blended about the same, and the flat surface was nice, but not superuseful because I don't really cake it on. But the Real Techniques sponge was good, too. However, she does have some thoughts on the specific features on the sponges: "I thought the Beautyblender was much easier to use because it's a tinge smaller, and it made it a lot easier to get near my eyes. I felt that the Real Techniques sponge did an almost identical job when it came to blending in my foundation (I usually put on my foundation with a brush and then use a sponge to blend it in).Ĭaruso usually uses those cheap-y makeup sponges that come 32 to a bag at Harmon's to blend in her foundation, so she thought both of these sponges were a major upgrade. As you can see, both sides of my face look pretty much the same. In the photo above, I did my makeup on the left side of my face with the Real Techniques sponge, and did the right side of my face with the Beautyblender. I decided to test out both of the sponges myself. Her final verdict? She'll stick with the Real Techniques sponge and will use the Beautyblender cleanser to wash it. It seems to do a great job at picking up and dispensing the product with each pat." The user also says that the Real Techniques sponge lasts longer than the Beautyblender after cleaning both of them daily with her Beautyblender Solid Cleanser. Comparing how both sponges blend the stripes of concealer I paint on my face to contour, the Real Techniques sponge certainly wins because of the shorter time that it takes. As far as blending in foundation (the most important part of both sponges), the user said, "I found that although I end up with similar results by using either of these sponges, it takes a lot more time to blend my makeup using the Beautyblender. Three months ago, a user posted a detailed side-by-side comparison of the Real Techniques sponge versus the Beautyblender. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |